It is not enough to say, "We treat everyone the same," because
that doesn't necessarily result in equal accessibility for all.
The outdated concept of formal equality prescribes identical treatment
of all individuals regardless of their actual circumstances. Real
equality requires a substantive approach:
"Sometimes 'equality' means treating people the same,
despite their differences, and sometimes it means treating them
as equals by accommodating their differences. Neutrality is
not compromised by treating some social differences differently;
but it may be by ignoring them. The reality is there are still
built-in headwinds for those who are different, those who are
thwarted in their conscious choices by stereotypes unconsciously
assigned. Disadvantage occurs for different people for different
reasons and each disadvantage is entitled to its own policy
response. Each group should be presumed to have the same entitlement:
to have their uniqueness acknowledged and accommodated, from
their perspective; to not be arbitrarily excluded or disadvantaged
because of their uniqueness; and to the availability of genuine
choices to [participate]."
(Judge Rosalie Silberman Abella of the Ontario
Appeal Court)
"Substantive equality requires that differences among
social groups be acknowledged and accommodated in policies and
practices to avoid adverse impacts on individual members of
the group. A substantive approach to equality evaluates the
fairness of apparently neutral policies and programs in light
of the larger social context of inequality, and emphasizes the
importance of equal outcomes which sometimes requires equal
treatment and sometimes different treatment.
Discrimination occurs when a program or policy—expressly or
by effect—creates a distinction between groups of individuals
which disadvantages one group based on shared personal characteristics
of members of that group in a manner inconsistent with human
dignity.
Systemic Discrimination occurs when problems of discrimination
are embedded in institutional policies and practices. Although
the institution's policies or practices might apply to everyone,
they create a distinction between groups of individuals which
disadvantage one group based on shared personal characteristics
of members of that group in a manner inconsistent with human
dignity. [For example, programs often unwittingly ostracize
lesbians by using 'he' when referring to the batterer and by
not providing literature that includes information for battered
lesbians.]
Equality also involves a duty to accommodate differences where
not to do so would deny equal access to services.
The current 'substantive approach' to equality in Canada recognizes
that treating individuals with different needs, resources and
life circumstances in exactly the same way may perpetuate inequality.
Instead, ensuring equal benefit requires that agencies respond
appropriately and fairly to differences in personal characteristics,
socio-economic circumstances, and life situations in order to
achieve greater equality in social outcomes.
Given the significant diversity amongst women, it is important
to assess the various experiences of inequality in women's lives,
and the multiple disadvantage that many women confront—social
inequalities associated with characteristics such as race, ethnocultural
heritage, poverty, disability, and sexual orientation may compound
the problems that women experience. An inclusive analysis that
investigates the situation and needs of diverse groups of women
can uncover potential problems and solutions for specific communities.
For example, although many women fear calling the police when
they are assaulted by their spouse, a refugee who was victimized
by police in her country of origin may be more afraid to call
the police in Canada for protection. She may also face language
barriers that discourage her from seeking help. Her experiences
and situation as a refugee compound her vulnerability to male
violence. An effective response to abuse must be designed to
respond to the specific barriers to services for women in all
situations. The ability to access services must be viewed as
an important interest for ensuring that we are all equal participants
in Canadian society."
(Diversity and Justice: Gender Perspectives:
A Guide to Gender Equality Analysis,
Office of the Senior Advisor on Gender Equality, Federal Department
of Justice,
http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/dept/pub/guide/guide.htm)
"Policies which are meant to ameliorate or improve
conditions for an equality seeking group do not discriminate
against people from the relatively more advantaged group, or
give preference to the equality seeking group.* For instance,
it is not discrimination for the government to provide sign
language interpretation for people with hearing impairments,
but not for able-bodied people who do not have difficulty hearing."
(Our Equality Rights in the Charter, Court Challenges
Web Site
http://www.ccppcj.ca/e/rights/rights-charter.shtml)
*A number of respondents seemed to think we were suggesting
that agencies should be giving special treatment or preference
to lesbians over other groups—one respondent even used the word
'preference' twice (once in the answer to Ques. 16 and once in 'Any other
comments?'; see ).
Are lesbians members of a group with different
needs, resources and life circumstances that recommend 'different'
treatment? i.e. are they members of:
"a group which:
- has experienced
and/or is now experiencing social, legal and/or economic disadvantage?
- is vulnerable to prejudice, or stereotyping?
- is vulnerable to being mistreated or having its needs/conditions
overlooked?
- is being prevented from participating fully in society?
- is a minority community within broader society?"
(Our Equality Rights in the Charter, Court Challenges
Web Site
http://www.ccppcj.ca/e/rights/rights-charter.shtml)
The answer to all of the above questions is 'Yes':
"Negative attitudes toward homosexuality exist [in
society] on a continuum from homophobia to heterosexism:
Homophobia:
Any belief system that supports negative myths and stereotypes
about homosexual people, or any of the varieties of negative
attitudes that arise from fear or dislike of homosexuality.
The irrational fear of, or aversion to, homosexuals and homosexuality.
Heterosexism: A belief system that values heterosexuality
as superior to and/or more natural than homosexuality; that
does not acknowledge the existence of non-heterosexuals; and
that assumes that all people are heterosexual. A belief that
heterosexuality is normative and that non-heterosexuality is
deviant and intrinsically less desirable. An expectation that
all individuals are heterosexual.
Homophobia can manifest itself in a number of ways:
Internal Homophobia: Learned biases that individuals,
including Gay males, Lesbians, and Bisexual males and females
(GLB), incorporate or internalize into their belief systems.
External Homophobia: Overtly observed or experienced
expression of internal biases such as social avoidance, verbal
abuse, and civil discrimination.
In addition, there are other types of homophobia/heterosexism:
Institutional Homophobia or Heterosexism: Refers to the
many ways in which government, business, churches, educational
institutions and other organizations and institutions discriminate
against people on the basis of sexual orientation. These organizations
and institutions set policies, allocate resources and maintain
unwritten standards for the behaviour of their members in ways
which discriminate. For example, many religious organizations
have stated policies against GLB people holding offices; most
educational institutions fail or refuse to allocate funds and
staff for GLB support groups; and most businesses have norms
for social events which prevent GLB employees from bringing
their same sex partners while heterosexual employees are encouraged
to bring their opposite sex partners.
Cultural Homophobia or Heterosexism: Refers to social
standards and norms which dictate that being heterosexual is
better or more moral than being GLB, and that everyone is heterosexual
or should be. While these standards are not written down as
such, they are spelled out each day in television shows where
the vast majority of characters are heterosexual and most relationships
involve a female and a male: or in the assumption made by most
adults in social situations that all 'normal' children will
eventually be attracted to and marry a person of the opposite
sex. Often heterosexual people do not realize that these standards
exist, while GLB people are acutely aware of the standards.
The feeling that results is one of being an outsider in society.
[For excellent demonstrations of cultural heterosexism, see
Appendix C 'Understanding Heterosexual
Privilege' and Appendix D
'A Question of Perspective'.]
Heterosexism is subtler than homophobia and permeates culture
and its social institutions. Homophobia and/or heterosexism
have been demonstrated in mental health practitioners, undergraduates,
nurses, governments and social workers.
Evidence exists that indicates that homophobia and stigmatization
of GLB is a serious and prevalent social problem in North America.
Most individuals do not perceive themselves as homophobic, yet
unfamiliarity with members of the GLB community can inadvertently
result in acceptance of misinformation or biased attitudes.
Several studies have shown that individuals who know one or
more GL personally demonstrate less hostility toward all GL."
(The Cost of Homophobia Literature Review of
the Economic Impact of Homophobia on Canada,
Submitted to Gay & Lesbian Health Services of Canada, July 2001)
Anyone who thinks lesbians do not experience homophobia in Saskatchewan
need only turn to the Individual Analysis ( ) to see that a lesbian
sexual orientation is not universally accepted even by the significant
people in the lives of Saskatchewan lesbians, never mind by strangers
at services agencies. Anyone who thinks there are no homophobic
or heterosexist staff in Saskatchewan service agencies should
consider this written comment re this survey by an attendee at
the 2001 annual conference of the Provincial Association of Transition
Houses of Saskatchewan: "What in heaven's name are we doing a
survey on gays for? Can't the money be spent on intervention and
prevention of more abuse?" (See also Appendices
E & F re the experiences of lesbian staff members of Saskatchewan
agencies.)
|